Ethics Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words - 9

Ethics - Essay ExampleIn Michael Pollans essay, he protested against the ill treatment of sensuals when they ar slaughtered for us to eat. He protested against suffering albeit it is not about human suffering but of animal suffering. Nevertheless, both protested against something, Martin Luther King, a leg give the sackary civil rights leader that helped end the discrimination against the Negro while Michael Pollan is a reputable animal rights activist known for his advocacy for animal rights and against artificial method of growing agriculture. In protesting against animal cruelty and suffering, Pollan used the rhetorical technique of personification and analogy to be able to footing in behalf of animals whose suffering he intends to mitigate if not end. avatar is a rhetorical technique of giving objects or animals human-like attribute and qualities. He also used analogy, which is a rhetorical technique used to contrast and reason similar instances. These devices of using perso nification and analogy are necessary for Pollan to use for him to elevate his subject (which are animals) to the province of human beings so that he well-defined fire effectively argue for them. Martin Luther King on the other hand used a different rhetorical technique due to the nature of his letter which was an open letter by nature (it was address to clergymen, plural) to be read by anyone of his constituents and not expecting for a formal reply because he was coming from jail and was addressed to a lot of people. Thu Martin Luther King used rhetorical question/remarks in his letter whereby he posed a lot of questions in his call to execution for the Negro to continue to assert through non-violent means to end segregation, discrimination and injustice. Thus his letter was peppered with rhetorical questions and remarks which numbered more than 28. Some of these rhetorical questions read as such How can you advocate breaking some laws and obeying others? Is not segregation an ex istential expression of mans tragic separation, his awful estrangement, his terrible sinfulness? Isnt this like objurgate a robbed man because his possession of money precipitated the evil act of robbery? Isnt this like condemning Socrates because his unswerving commitment to truth and his philosophical inquiries precipitated the act by the misguided populace in which they made him drink hemlock? Isnt this like condemning Jesus because his unique God consciousness and never ceasing devotion to Gods leave behind precipitated the evil act of crucifixion? One many think that these rhetorical technique is inflammatory that borders to anger. But it has to be noted to put the letter in proper perspective that such letter is Martin Luther Kings call to action. In a way his way to vent his frustration over the inertia of the church and the Negroes but was not said in anger as he clarifies in the letter In deep disappointment I have a bun in the oven wept over the laxity of the church. T here can be no deep disappointment where there in not deep love. It is difficult to compare to the same level Pollans advocacy for animals with Kings civil rights movement. King was virtually upholding human dignity for the Negro to be treated as human beings while Pollans argument almost called for animals to be treated with relative dignity as he asserted for ending their suffering and